Hi Dennis,
You reminded me of the saying that 9 woman can't make a baby in one month.
This saying is very true (and funny) but luckily for us, we have more control over how software is made that how babies are made.
I should rephrase my question / conversation topic. I'm actually not interested in playing back 4k videos of STD player but rather I'm interested in reducing the amount time and files that are required to create large video surfaces. Basically, it would be
very useful if there was either:
1) No video resolution maximum or (if you really want to keep a limit)
2) A video resolution limit that matched the total output resolution of the client computer.
That way we could have one 1 video file per computer rather than multiple files. This would save a lot of time and reduce headaches for everyone.
But looking at the bigger picture, even 4k is not big or versatile enough. If I have a 8 projector wide image and computers with 3 or 4 outputs, right now, with 4k max, I cannot create files that are 5760x1080 or 7680x1200. I need to double the amount of files required and this adds unnecessary time (in programming, file creation and management) and it adds complexity and potential for mistakes.
Limiting the maximum video file resolution only makes it more complicated and time consuming for the content creation team and the Pandora's Box programmers. In the end, the people who are the most affected by this limitation are users and not the ones paying for the bills and buying the Coolux Licenses.
That's why I think the video resolution's maximum should be revised.
Do you see what I mean?
I think this would be very beneficial for everyone. Both for Coolux and its users. That's because the simpler and faster a program is to use, the more people will want to use it and buy it.